United States of America v. Everett Darnell Armstrong

09-6131Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26 de jun. de 2009

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6131
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EVERETT DARNELL ARMSTRONG,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:00-cr-00158-RAJ-1)
Submitted: June 8, 2009 Decided: June 26, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Everett Darnell Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Everett Darnell Armstrong appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a
sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Armstrong’s contention that the district
court attributed him with only 1.5 kilograms of cocaine base is
contradicted by the criminal judgment’s statement that the
district court adopted the factual findings of the presentence
investigation report. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Armstrong, No.
2:00-cr-00158-RAJ-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 2008). Further, we deny
Armstrong’s motions for preparation of transcripts at the
government’s expense and for appointment of counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.