Michelle Johnson Bah; Mountaga Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank Na

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2217
MICHELLE JOHNSON BAH; MOUNTAGA BAH,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK NA,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
HSBC BANK USA; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; REAL TIME
RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED; WELLS FARGO BANK WEST N.A.; HUD,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08-
cv-03429-RWT)
Submitted: June 9, 2014 Decided: June 10, 2014
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mary E. Goulet, WHITHAM, CURTIS, CHRISTOFFERSON & COOK, P.C.,
Reston, Virginia, for Appellants. Amy S. Owen, Elizabeth S.
Finberg, COCHRAN & OWEN, L.L.C., Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

PER CURIAM:
Michelle Johnson Bah and Mountaga Bah appeal from the
district court’s order dismissing their civil action, pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), in which they sought to prevent
foreclosure proceedings against their home. We have reviewed
the record and the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, No. 8:08-cv-03429-
RWT (D. Md. Sept. 23, 2009). We deny the Appellee’s motion to
strike and for sanctions, and we dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2

-- 2 of 2 --