Rodriguez Samuel Da Matha De Santanna v. BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP; ERIC FRECHTEL, Attorney

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2154
RODRIGUEZ SAMUEL DA MATHA DE SANTANNA,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP; ERIC FRECHTEL, Attorney,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09-
cv-02438-RWT)
Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 19, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodriguez Samuel Da Matha De Santanna, Appellant Pro Se. Scott
Burnett Smith, BRADLEY, ARANT, ROSE & WHITE, Huntsville,
Alabama, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Rodriguez Samuel Da Matha De Santanna appeals from the
district court order dismissing his claims against the law firm
of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP (“Bradley Arant”). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Da
Matha De Santanna v. Bradley Arant Cummings LLP, No. 8:09-cv-
02438-RWT (D. Md. Sept. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --