Stephen W. Stone v. Seneca South Carolina, City of

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1693
STEPHEN W. STONE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SENECA SOUTH CAROLINA, CITY OF,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(8:07-cv-03401-HFF)
Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: May 12, 2010
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mary C. McCormac, Clemson, South Carolina, for Appellant. Vance
J. Bettis, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, L.L.P., Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen W. Stone appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Seneca on all
of Stone’s claims. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Stone v. City of Seneca, South Carolina,
No. 8:07-cv-03401-HFF (D.S.C. May 14, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --