United States of America v. Reginald M. Richardson, a/k/a Reggie, a/k/a Danny Brooks, a/k/a Michael Lynn…

08-8329Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 de set. de 2009

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8329
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
REGINALD M. RICHARDSON, a/k/a Reggie, a/k/a Danny Brooks,
a/k/a Michael Lynn Richardson, a/k/a Tony Collier,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:97-cr-00104-JRS-3)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: September 2, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Robert. J.
Wagner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, Acting United States Attorney,
Richard D. Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Richardson appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction
of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Richardson, No. 3:97-cr-00104-
JRS-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 8, 2008). We further deny Richardson’s
motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.