Olin Wooten v. Robert C. Lightburn

08-2279Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12 de nov. de 2009

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2279
OLIN WOOTEN,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ROBERT C. LIGHTBURN,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Glen M. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (1:07-cv-00052-gmw-pms)
Submitted: October 28, 2009 Decided: November 12, 2009
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
C. Connor Crook, BOYLE, BAIN, REBACK & SLAYTON, Charlottesville,
Virginia, for Appellant. Daniel R. Bieger, COPELAND & BIEGER,
P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Robert C. Lightburn appeals the district court’s order
entering judgment in Olin Wooten’s favor on Wooten’s specific
performance and unjust enrichment claims against Lightburn. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See
Wooten v. Lightburn, No. 1:07-cv-00052-gmw-pms (W.D. Va.
Sept. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.