Donald M. Boysaw v. Michael Friedman; Howard R. Udell; Paul Goldenheim

08-2184Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit6 de abr. de 2009

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2184
DONALD M. BOYSAW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL FRIEDMAN; HOWARD R. UDELL; PAUL GOLDENHEIM,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
PURDUE PHARMA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief
District Judge. (1:07-cv-00079-jpj-pms)
Submitted: March 26, 2009 Decided: April 6, 2009
Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald M. Boysaw, Appellant Pro Se. Cameron Scott Bell, William
W. Eskridge, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Donald M. Boysaw appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boysaw
v. Friedman, No. 1:07-cv-00079-jpj-pms (W.D. Va. Sept. 30,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.