Yuri J. Stoyanov v. DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary of the Navy

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2040
YURI J. STOYANOV,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary of the Navy; STEPHAN W. PETRI,
Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of the
Carderock Division; GARY M. JEBSEN, Individually and in his
Official Capacity as the Head of Code 70 Carderock Division;
KEVIN M. WILSON, Individually and in his Official Capacity
as the Acting Head of Code 74 Carderock Division; JAMES H.
KING, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head
of Code 74 Carderock Division; JOHN C. DAVIES, Individually
and in his Official Capacity as the Deputy Head of Code 74
Carderock Division; MATHEW CRAUN, Individually and in his
Official Capacity as the Head of Code 722 Carderock
Division; PAUL SHANG, Individually and in his Official
Capacity as the Head of Code 72 Carderock Division; GERALD
SMITH, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy
Head of Code 70 Carderock Division; ROGER FORD, Individually
and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 7014
Carderock Division; M. KATHLEEN FOWLER, Individually and in
her Official Capacity as Administrative Officer Code 709;
DAVID CARON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as
Assistant Counsel Code 39; JOSEPHINE MCGRATH, Individually
and in her Official Capacity as Complaints Manager/Acting
Deputy EEO Chief Code 034,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:06-
cv-01244-AMD)
Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 15, 2009

-- 1 of 3 --

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Yuri J. Stoyanov, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Yuri J. Stoyanov appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.
§§ 621 to 634 (2000), the Whisleblower Protection Act, 5 U.S.C.
§§ 1214, 1221 and 2302 (2006), and various state law tort
claims, as well as its order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s orders. See Stoyanov v. Winter, No. 1:06-cv-01244-AMD
(D. Md. Aug. 11, 2008; Aug. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --