United States of America v. DANIEL DEMETRIOUS JAMES, JR., a/k/a Dee

07-6824Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19 de set. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6824
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DANIEL DEMETRIOUS JAMES, JR., a/k/a Dee,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (5:04-cr-00262-FL)
Submitted: September 13, 2007 Decided: September 19, 2007
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Demetrious James, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Demetrious James, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying his motion for a hearing based on the
Government’s alleged breach of the plea agreement. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. James, No. 5:04-cr-00262-FL (E.D.N.C. May 7, 2007). We
deny as unnecessary James’ motion for a certificate of
appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.