07-6667•Carl Lee Robinson, Jr v. R. Wellman
07-6667Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26 de jul. de 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6667
CARL LEE ROBINSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
R. WELLMAN; FRANK O’NEAL; MARVIN POLK; EDDIE
MCKOY; B. CORRELL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:06-ct-03102)
Submitted: July 18, 2007 Decided: July 26, 2007
Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carl Lee Robinson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Carl Lee Robinson, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action without
prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and
denying his motion for preliminary injunction, motion to amend his
complaint and requests for discovery as moot. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Robinson v. Wellman,
No. 5:06-ct-03102 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.