United States of America v. Elbert Thomas Knight

07-6401Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16 de out. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ELBERT THOMAS KNIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 07-6402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ELBERT THOMAS KNIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:96-cr-00196-HCM; 2:00-cr-00056-RAJ)
Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 16, 2007

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elbert Thomas Knight, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Elbert Thomas Knight
appeals the district court’s order denying reconsideration of his
motion seeking an order to compel the Government to file a motion
to reduce his sentence based on substantial assistance. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United
States v. Knight, Nos. 2:96-cr-00196-HCM; 2:00-cr-00056-RAJ (E.D.
Va. filed Feb. 27, 2007; entered Feb. 28, 2007). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.