James Edward Harris v. City of Raleigh

07-6065Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 de ago. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6065
JAMES EDWARD HARRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF RALEIGH; RALEIGH CHIEF OF POLICE;
OFFICER MADDOCK; OFFICER DUFAULT; OFFICER J.W.
BISHOP; OFFICER S. M. HOOLAN; OFFICER D. B.
KILGORE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
District Judge. (5:06-cv-00496-D)
Submitted: July 25, 2007 Decided: August 2, 2007
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Edward Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Harris appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Harris v. City of Raleigh, No. 5:06-cv-00496-D
(E.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 2006; Jan. 3, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.