Herman Cefus Newman v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director

06-7977Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18 de mai. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7977
HERMAN CEFUS NEWMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director; FRED SCHILLING,
Medical Director; EDDIE PEARSON, Warden;
HUNTER JOHNSON, Major; MS. MASSENGBURG,
Grievance Coordinator,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:05-cv-00566-JBF)
Submitted: May 4, 2007 Decided: May 18, 2007
Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herman Cefus Newman, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Herman Cefus Newman appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Newman v.
Johnson, No. 2:05-cv-00566-JBF (E.D. Va. Nov. 6, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.