Lloyd Steven Lane v. Juanita H. Baker

06-7738Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11 de abr. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7738
LLOYD STEVEN LANE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JUANITA H. BAKER; JEWYL E. DUNN; REGINA
BROOKS; CHARLES L. MANN, SR.; ELBERT T. BUCK,
JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (5:05-ct-00212-H)
Submitted: March 28, 2007 Decided: April 11, 2007
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd Steven Lane, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lloyd Steven Lane appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lane v.
Baker, No. 5:05-ct-00212-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.