United States of America v. Duane Jeleal Osbourne, a/k/a Duane Anthony Osborne, a/k/a Rocky, a/k/a Sealed

06-7451Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit5 de set. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7451
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DUANE JELEAL OSBOURNE, a/k/a Duane Anthony
Osborne, a/k/a Rocky, a/k/a Sealed Defendant
#12,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (3:95-cr-00178-12)
Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Duane Jeleal Osbourne, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Duane Jeleal Osbourne appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion filed
under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000 & Supp. 2007). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States
v. Osbourne, No. 3:95-cr-00178-12 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2006). We
grant Osbourne’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.