United States of America v. Dennis Carl Harris

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7409
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DENNIS CARL HARRIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 06-7410
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ALFRED CALDWELL, a/k/a Big Al,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (2:92-cr-00113-01; 2:92-cr-00113-03)
Submitted: July 31, 2007 Decided: August 14, 2007
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Carl Harris, Alfred Caldwell, Appellants Pro Se. Laura
Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Dennis Harris and Alfred
Caldwell appeal the district court’s orders denying their motions
for modification of their sentences, filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2000), and denying reconsideration of those orders.
We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not
abuse its discretion in denying the motions. Accordingly, although
we grant Appellants’ motions to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States
v. Harris, No. 2:92-cr-00113-01 (E.D. Va. May 19, 2006; July 31,
2006); United States v. Caldwell, No. 2:92-cr-00113-03 (E.D. Va.
May 19, 2006; July 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --