Reginald Askew v. MCCULLOUGH; MICHAEL V. NORRIS; D. J. METIKO, Doctor

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6509
REGINALD ASKEW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR LIGHTSEY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MARVIN L. POLK; V. MCCULLOUGH; MICHAEL V.
NORRIS; D. J. METIKO, Doctor,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (5:05-ct-00022-H)
Submitted: September 29, 2006 Decided: November 9, 2006
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Askew, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth P. McCullough, YOUNG,
MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Askew appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Askew v. Polk,
No. 5:05-ct-00022-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2006). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --