Earl Barnett v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2303
EARL BARNETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief
District Judge. (1:05-cv-00058-IMK-JS)
Submitted: May 30, 2007 Decided: June 15, 2007
Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl Barnett, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Earl T. Barnett appeals the district court order adopting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and rejecting it
in part, granting Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ motion for
summary judgment, and dismissing Barnett’s civil action with
prejudice. Barnett also appeals the district court’s order denying
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration of that order.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Barnett v. Gonzales, No. 1:05-cv-00058-IMK-JS (N.D. W.
Va. Sept. 27 & Nov. 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --