Carl Klunk v. U.s. Cost, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1926
CARL KLUNK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
U.S. COST, INCORPORATED; PARSONS MANAGEMENT
CONSULTANTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (1:05-cv-01262-TSE)
Submitted: March 28, 2007 Decided: April 11, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dean E. Wanderer, DEAN E. WANDERER & ASSOCIATES, Fairfax, Virginia,
for Appellant. Gregory J. Digel, HOLLAND & KNIGHT, LLP, Atlanta,
Georgia; Kathleen M. Williams, EPSTEIN, BECKER & GREEN, P.C.,
Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Carl Klunk appeals the district court’s order dismissing
this action with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(d). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated from the bench by the
district court. Klunk v. U.S. Cost, Inc., No. 1:05-cv-01262-TSE
(E.D. Va. July 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --