Jesse Lowell Satterfield v. United States Department of Labor

06-1838Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30 de jan. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1838
JESSE LOWELL SATTERFIELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; MINE SAFETY
AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief
District Judge. (1:03-cv-00165-IMK)
Submitted: January 12, 2007 Decided: January 30, 2007
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jesse Lowell Satterfield, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jesse Lowell Satterfield appeals the district court’s
orders granting the Appellees’ motion for summary judgment and
denying Satterfield’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions in this
employment discrimination case. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Satterfield v. Chao, No. 1:03-
cv-00165-IMK (N.D. W. Va. Apr. 25 and June 13, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.