Usrp (gant 1), LLC v. BILLY WAYNE LANGSTON, JR., d/b/a Pit & Pump Tanks & Equipment, Incorporated

06-1528Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17 de jan. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1528
USRP (GANT 1), LLC; USRP (GANT 2), LLC,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
versus
BILLY WAYNE LANGSTON, JR., d/b/a Pit & Pump
Tanks & Equipment, Incorporated,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (4:04-cv-00143-D)
Submitted: November 30, 2006 Decided: January 17, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy Wayne Langston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard C. Gaskins,
Jr., Michael T. Champion, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Billy Wayne Langston, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment in favor of USRP (Gant 1), LLC, and
USRP (Gant 2), LLC (“USRP”) on USRP’s complaint seeking damages for
environmental remediation costs. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See USRP v. Langston, No. 4:04-cv-
00143-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2006). Additionally, we deny Langston’s
pending motion to strike USRP’s informal brief. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.