Sandra D. Clark v. Siemens Vdo Automotive Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1172
SANDRA D. CLARK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Walter D. Kelley, Jr.,
District Judge. (4:05-cv-00093-WDK)
Submitted: March 9, 2007 Decided: April 9, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Torrino Travell Travis, LAW OFFICE OF TRAVELL TRAVIS, Hampton,
Virginia, for Appellant. Dana L. Rust, Kathleen M. McDaniel,
MCGUIREWOODS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Sandra D. Clark appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to grant
Defendant’s motion, filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b), to
dismiss Clark’s civil action for failure to comply with the court’s
order compelling Clark to attend her noticed deposition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clark v.
Siemens VDO Auto. Corp., No. 4:05-cv-00093-WDK (E.D. Va. Jan. 24,
2006) (accepting the findings of the magistrate judge). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --