United States of America v. Martell Whitaker

05-7948Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit5 de jun. de 2006

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7948
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MARTELL WHITAKER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CR-98-1016)
Submitted: April 21, 2006 Decided: June 5, 2006
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martell Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Martell Whitaker appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Whitaker, No. CR-98-1016 (D.S.C.
Nov. 29, 2005). We grant the motion to vacate the supplemental
informal brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.