Rodney Elmer Anderson v. Xyz Correctional Health Services, Inc

05-7523Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27 de fev. de 2006

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7523
RODNEY ELMER ANDERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
XYZ CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC.;
RONALD J. ANGELONE; D. A. GARRAGHTY; M. C.
MILLARD; DOCTOR SWEATER; JOHN DOE; DOCTOR
SWETTER; JOE DOE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
ANDREW J. WINSTON; JAMES A. SMITH, JR.; K. W.
DAVIS; MR. ZUMMER; MARSHA FORESMAN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-02-1045-1-GBL)
Submitted: February 3, 2006 Decided: February 27, 2006
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Rodney Elmer Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Carlton Hollowell,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia;
Ashton Marie Jennette, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Elmer Anderson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as untimely under
the applicable statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. XYZ Corr.
Health Serv., Inc., No. CA-02-1045-1-GBL (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 26,
2005 & entered Aug. 29, 2005). We deny Anderson’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.