United States of America v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 4th Cir. 1993 holding that issues raised for the…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7458
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KEVIN ANTHONY DUDLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR-
03-253-8-PJM)
Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 6, 2006
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Anthony Dudley, Appellant Pro Se. James Marton Trusty,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*We do not address Dudley’s claim that his plea agreement
should be withdrawn as this claim was raised for the first time on
appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993)
(holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal are
generally waived absent exceptional circumstances).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Anthony Dudley appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to correct sentence. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Dudley, No.
CR-03-253-8-PJM (D. Md. Aug. 23, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process. *
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --