Wayne Douglas Butts v. Doctor Jamaludeen

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7398
WAYNE DOUGLAS BUTTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR JAMALUDEEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-04-424)
Submitted: December 21, 2005 Decided: January 18, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Douglas Butts, Appellant Pro Se. John David McChesney, RAWLS
& MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Wayne Douglas Butts seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Butts v. Jamaludeen, No. CA-04-424 (E.D. Va. Aug. 4, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --