Jerry Griffin v. Officer Wright

05-6767Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30 de jan. de 2006

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6767
JERRY GRIFFIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OFFICER WRIGHT; OFFICER BENNETT; OFFICER
ARRINGTON; RANDY LEE; THEODIS BECK,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-177-5-FL)
Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: January 30, 2006
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Harper Graham, Assistant
Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Griffin appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Griffin’s motion to appoint counsel, grant his motion to amend his
informal brief, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
See Griffin v. Wright, No. CA-04-177-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.