Frederick Green v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 1949 . The

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6648
FREDERICK GREEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JONATHAN E. OZMINT, Director of SCDC; GEORGE
HAGAN, Warden of Allendale Correctional
Institution; LAVERNE COHEN, Associate Warden
of Special Management Unit (SMU); ANN HALLMAN,
Institutional Grievance Coordinator at
Allendale Correctional Institution; SAMUEL
KEARSE, Lieutenant and SMU Supervisor at
Allendale Correctional Institution; OTHER
UNKNOWN AGENCY OFFICIALS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-04-22074-2)
Submitted: October 31, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Green, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann,
DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Rehearing granted, March 24, 2006

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Green seeks to appeal the district court’s
order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and
denying his motion for a temporary restraining order. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Green seeks to appeal
is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. See Office of Pers. Mgmt. v. Am. Fed'n of Gov't
Employees, 473 U.S. 1301, 1303-04 (1985); Drudge v. McKernon, 482
F.2d 1375, 1376 (4th Cir. 1973). Accordingly, we deny Green’s
motion to expedite the appeal, and we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --