Harry L. Dantzler v. USPO, District of South Carolina

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6060
HARRY L. DANTZLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
USPO, District of South Carolina,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-04-1735-4-18BH)
Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: June 29, 2005
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harry L. Dantzler, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Harry L. Dantzler appeals the district court’s order
denying his petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the
United States Probation Office to correct an allegedly erroneous
entry in a criminal presentence report. Our review of the record,
including the district court’s opinion adopting the magistrate
judge’s report and recommendation, discloses no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Dantzler v. USPO, No. CA-04-1735-4-18BH (D.S.C. Dec. 2,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --