(ca-05-129-2-Jbf) Tammy S. Mizell v. Sara Lee Corporation

Filed: January 4, 2006
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1754
(CA-05-129-2-JBF)
TAMMY S. MIZELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SARA LEE CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed December 13, 2005, as
follows:
On page 1, attorney information section -- “John Michael
Loeschen, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant” is deleted and replaced
with “Tammy S. Mizell, Appellant Pro Se.”
For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk

-- 1 of 3 --

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1754
TAMMY S. MIZELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SARA LEE CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-05-129-2-JBF)
Submitted: November 30, 2005 Decided: December 13, 2005
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tammy S. Mizell, Appellant Pro Se. John Richard Erickson, REED
SMITH, L.L.P., Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Tammy S. Mizell appeals the district court’s order
denying Mizell’s breach of employment contract claim. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mizell v.
Sara Lee Corp., No. CA-05-129-2-JBF (E.D. Va. June 10, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --