Dino J. Broccoli v. Echostar Communications Corporation

05-1625Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30 de jan. de 2006

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1625
DINO J. BROCCOLI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ANDREW SKLAR, Esquire and Trustee of Dino J.
Broccoli,
Plaintiff,
versus
ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION; DISH
NETWORK SERVICE CORPORATION; STACIE ANDERSEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
------------------------
SANDRA FULLER,
Movant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03-
3447-AMD)
Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: January 30, 2006
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Dino J. Broccoli, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ross Niccolini, Elena
Daly Marcuss, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Dino J. Broccoli appeals from the district court's denial
of his motion for a new trial following the jury’s verdict returned
after seven days of witness testimony, in his civil discrimination
case filed against his former employer, in which he alleged sexual
harassment and retaliation. Having reviewed the record and the
issues raised on appeal, we find that the appeal is without merit.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Broccoli v.
EchoStar Commnc’ns Corp., No. CA-03-3447-AMD (D. Md. Mar. 20,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.