Amy Schuele v. Stratia Group, Incorporated

05-1274Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29 de nov. de 2005

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1274
AMY SCHUELE; DOUGLAS SCHUELE, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
STRATIA GROUP, INCORPORATED; GREG BARRETT,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
STRATIA EDUCATION, LLC; DANIEL E. HAUG;
CAPITAL RESOURCE GROUP, INCORPORATED,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04-
2970-AMD)
Submitted: November 4, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005
Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark E. Herman, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Amy Schuele and Douglas Schuele appeal the district
court’s orders dismissing their complaint without prejudice based
on failure to serve process and denying their motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Schuele v. Stratia Group, Inc., No. CA-04-
2970-AMD (D. Md. Feb. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.