Janie Thomas v. Russell Brown

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1195
JANIE THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RUSSELL BROWN,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 05-1417
JANIE THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RUSSELL BROWN,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 05-1439
JANIE THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
RUSSELL BROWN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-03-3846-2-23-PMD)
Submitted: October 26, 2005 Decided: November 22, 2005
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Russell Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Fleet Freeman, FREEMAN & FREEMAN,
Mount Pleasant, South Carolina; Richard Allan Hricik, THE LAW
OFFICES OF RICHARD A. HRICIK, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Russell Brown appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting
summary judgment to plaintiff, and the district court’s subsequent
orders entering judgment on the jury’s verdict on damages, granting
plaintiff’s motions to strike his interlocutory notices of appeal,
and denying his motion and amended motion for stay of execution of
the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Thomas v. Brown, No. CA-03-3846-2-23-PMD
(D.S.C. Mar. 4, 11 & 15, 2005; Apr. 6, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --