Sherry White-Battle v. Democratic Party of Virginia

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1087
SHERRY WHITE-BATTLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF VIRGINIA; NORFOLK CITY
DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
GEORGE SCHAEFER; NORFOLK ELECTORAL BOARD,
Defendants,
versus
ELISA LONG, General Registrar of the City of
Norfolk; EILEEN M. ADDISON,
Movants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-897-2)
Submitted: May 27, 2005 Decided: June 21, 2005

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sherry White-Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Edward Heretick,
Portsmouth, Virginia; Robert Bryan Rigney, PROTOGYROU & RIGNEY,
PLC, Norfolk, Virginia; Harold Phillip Juren, Deputy City Attorney,
Norfolk, Virginia; Eileen M. Addison, COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE, Yorktown, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Sherry White-Battle appeals the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment to Defendants and denying her motions to
amend and for discovery. See White-Battle v. Democratic Party of
Virginia, No. CA-03-897-2 (E.D. Va. June 29 & Nov. 12, 2004). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. In addition, we find the district court
did not abuse its discretion in denying White-Battle’s motions to
amend and for discovery. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --