Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. Estate of Karen Denise Lane Riner

05-1084Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29 de jul. de 2005

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1084
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
DOUGLAS C. RINER,
Defendant - Appellant,
versus
ESTATE OF KAREN DENISE LANE RINER; ROBERT
VARNER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District
Judge. (CA-00-65-1-JPJ)
Submitted: June 30, 2005 Decided: July 29, 2005
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas C. Riner, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Worth McAfee, MCAFEE
LAW FIRM, P.C., Norton, Virginia, for Appellees. Deborah Wood
Dobbins, Robin J. Kegley, GILMER, SADLER, INGRAM, SUTHERLAND &
HUTTON, Pulaski, Virginia, for Plaintiff.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Douglas C. Riner appeals the district court’s order
awarding summary judgment to defendant and denying his motion to
stay the proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Connecticut
General Life Ins. Co. v. Riner, No. CA-00-65-1-JPJ (W.D. Va. Jan 4.
2005). We deny Riner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this
court as moot because he paid the filing fee. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.