Hong Cheng v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 1992 . Accordingly, we deny the

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1074
HONG CHENG,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A70-583-458)
Submitted: August 19, 2005 Decided: September 28, 2005
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sunit K. Joshi, JOSHI & ASSOCIATES, PC, New York, New York, for
Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Emily
Anne Radford, Assistant Director, Keith Ian Bernstein, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Hong Cheng, a native and citizen of China, petitions for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
denying as untimely his motion to reopen immigration proceedings.
We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the
Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen.
See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we
deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
See In re: Cheng, No. A70-583-458 (B.I.A. Dec. 20, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --