05-1052•Alexandra Baten v. South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice
05-1052Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit8 de jul. de 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1052
ALEXANDRA BATEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Bristow Marchant, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-01-980-3-10BD)
Submitted: June 17, 2005 Decided: July 8, 2005
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chalmers C. Johnson, CHALMERS JOHNSON LAW FIRM, Charleston, South
Carolina, for Appellant. Kathryn Thomas, Christina M. Summer,
GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Alexandra Baten appeals the magistrate judge’s * order
denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate
judge. See Baten v. South Carolina Dep’t of Juvenile Justice, No.
CA-01-980-3-10BD (D.S.C. Dec. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.