Darlene P. Lumpkin v. WILLIAM TORRES, Doctor

04-7078Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit9 de nov. de 2004

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7078
DARLENE P. LUMPKIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM TORRES, Doctor,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MISS FRYE, Nurse,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (CA-02-792-3)
Submitted: November 4, 2004 Decided: November 9, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darlene P. Lumpkin, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Joseph McNelis, III,
Coreen Antoinette Bromfield, John David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS,
PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Darlene P. Lumpkin appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Lumpkin v. Torres, No. CA-02-792-3 (E.D. Va. May 28, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.