William Henry Roach v. Robert E. Maxey, in his individual

04-7015Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24 de nov. de 2004

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7015
WILLIAM HENRY ROACH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT E. MAXEY, in his individual and
official capacity; CHRISTOPHER WEBB; MR. COOK;
NURSE MOON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-831-7)
Submitted: October 29, 2004 Decided: November 24, 2004
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Henry Roach, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson,
PERRY & WINDELS, Dillwyn, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
William Henry Roach appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Roach v.
Maxey, No. CA-02-831-7 (W.D. Va. filed June 1, 2004; entered
June 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.