04-6603•Lamar E. Burgest, Iii v. Wiley, No. CA-04-115-3 E.D. Va. Mar. 15, 2004 . We deny leave to proceed
04-6603Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 de ago. de 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6603
LAMAR E. BURGEST, III,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RON WILEY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-04-115-3)
Submitted: August 18, 2004 Decided: August 25, 2004
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lamar E. Burgest, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lamar E. Burgest, III, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Burgest v. Wiley, No. CA-04-115-3 (E.D. Va.
Mar. 15, 2004). We deny leave to proceed on appeal in forma
pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.