04-6209•Timothy Grimes v. R. Fowler
04-6209Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21 de jul. de 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6209
TIMOTHY GRIMES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
R. FOWLER; G. JOHNSON; W. P. TRUE; JOHN DOES,
Officials of ROSP; CAPTAIN HOCKETT; W. SMITH;
M. BUCHANAN; J. BENTLEY; JOHN DOES, Officials
of WRSP; JOHN DOES, Practitioners ROSP; JEAN
DOES, Red Onion State Prison; SERGEANT HEAD;
PRISON GUARD BOWEN; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
OWENS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
T. JOHNSON; A. BAKER,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief
District Judge and Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-01-526-2)
Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 21, 2004
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Timothy Grimes, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Foster Barr, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Alexander Leonard
Taylor, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,
Virginia; Gary Clay Hancock, Timothy Edmond Kirtner, GILMER,
SADLER, INGRAM, SUTHERLAND & HUTTON, Pulaski, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Grimes appeals the district court’s order
granting judgment in favor of the Appellees in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2000) action in accordance with a jury verdict. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the judgment of the district court. See Grimes v. Fowler, No. CA-
01-526-2 (W.D. Va. Jan. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.