Arthur E. Eberts, Jr v. Halliburton Energy Services, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2272
ARTHUR E. EBERTS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief
District Judge. (CA-03-229-1)
Submitted: April 27, 2005 Decided: May 20, 2005
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Florio, FLORIO LAW OFFICES, Clarksburg, West Virginia,
for Appellant. Vanessa Griffith, VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P., Houston,
Texas, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Arthur E. Eberts, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
granting Halliburton’s motion to compel arbitration and dismissing
Eberts’ complaint and denying Eberts’ motion to alter or amend. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Eberts v. Halliburton Energy Servs., Inc., No. CA-03-229-1 (N.D. W.
Va. Mar. 19 & Sept. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --