Jeffrey Thomas Farmer v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 1978 quoting United States v. Robinson,…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2237
JEFFREY THOMAS FARMER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STEVEN BERRYMAN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (CA-04-691-1)
Submitted: November 4, 2004 Decided: November 9, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey Thomas Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson,
CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Thomas Farmer seeks to appeal the district
court’s order transferring the case to another district court. We
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of
appeal was not timely filed.
In a civil case, the notice of appeal must be filed no
more than thirty days after the entry of the district court’s
order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court
extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens
the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal
period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director,
Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.
Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on
July 30, 2004. The notice of appeal was filed on August 31, 2004,
or one day beyond the thirty day appeal period. Because Farmer
failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension
or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --