ALPHONSO JACKSON, Acting Secretary of Housing v. George Haydu

04-2078Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15 de abr. de 2005

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2078
ALPHONSO JACKSON, Acting Secretary of Housing
and Urban Development,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GEORGE HAYDU,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
BUYERS SOURCE SUGARMILL, L.L.C.; BUYERS SOURCE
SAVANNAH, L.L.C.; BUYERS SOURCE VALLEY GROUP,
L.L.C.; ISLAND REALTY, L.L.C.; BSMC,
I N C O R P O R A T E D ; B E L M O N T P R O P E R T I E S ,
INCORPORATED; ONE SOURCE EQUITY, L.L.C.;
FREDERICK BLAKE; THOMAS BREWER; LANNY
CAMPBELL; SUSAN GARD; HENRY MONTGOMERY; SUSAN
SMOTHERS, a/k/a Susan Strothers; JO ANNE
BARROS; DARRELL BROOKS; PATRICK CAMPBELL; MIKE
DURHAM; BILL ELKO; LEON LUCARELLI, a/k/a Leon
Masterson; BEVERLY MCPHERSON; DAWN MOCK;
CHRIS A. MONTGOMERY; GREGORY SANJURJO; JEFF
VOTAW; SANDY WILLIAMS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-591-2)

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Submitted: March 30, 2005 Decided: April 15, 2005
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Haydu, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Cozad Biddle, Tara Leigh
Grove, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
George Haydu appeals the district court’s order imposing
an injunctive sanction and ordering restitution for conduct that
violated the Interstate Land Sales Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1720
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Jackson v. Haydu, No. CA-03-591-2 (E.D. Va. filed
Aug. 3, 2004 & entered Aug. 4, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.