Milton McCray v. America Online

04-2005Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23 de nov. de 2004

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2005
MILTON MCCRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
AMERICA ONLINE,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
NETMARKET; CREDIT ALERT; AUTOVANTAGE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-
03-3616-JFM)
Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004
Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Milton McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Todd Blank,
MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland; William Harrison Baxter,
II, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
Milton McCray appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of Defendants in this civil action and
the court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See McCray v. Am. Online, No. CA-03-3616-JFM (D. Md.
June 17, 2004; July 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.