James Chester Perkins v. Douglas Orr, Iii

04-1981Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13 de jan. de 2005

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1981
JAMES CHESTER PERKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOUGLAS ORR, III; UNKNOWN DEPUTY 1; UNKNOWN
DEPUTY 2; UNKNOWN DEPUTY 3; HORRY’S WRECKER
SERVICE; TOW TRUCK DRIVER; DIRECTOR OF
DETENTION FACILITY; JAILER; JASPER COUNTY
SHERIFF; JOHN DOE 1-20,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CA-04-835-9-8)
Submitted: December 17, 2004 Decided: January 13, 2005
Before LUTTIG and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Chester Perkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James Chester Perkins appeals the district court’s order
substantially accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Perkins v. Orr, No. CA-04-835-9-8 (D.S.C. July 1, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.