Alan Douglas Ramsay v. Home Depot, Inc., No. CA-03-1504-AMD D. Md. May 27, 2004; June 5, 2004 paperless

04-1816Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22 de dez. de 2004

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1816
ALAN DOUGLAS RAMSAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE HOME DEPOT, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03-
1504-AMD)
Submitted: November 30, 2004 Decided: December 22, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David M. Kopstein, DROSS, LEVENSTEIN, PERILMAN & KOPSTEIN,
Seabrook, Maryland, for Appellant. Matthew T. Angotti, Edwin L.
Keating, ANDERSON, COE & KING, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Alan Douglas Ramsay appeals the district court’s orders
granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the
reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion.
See Ramsay v. Home Depot, Inc., No. CA-03-1504-AMD (D. Md. May 27,
2004; June 5, 2004 (paperless order denying reconsideration)). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.