Tammy M. Stone v. LARRY STARCHER, Chief Supreme Court Justice

04-1574Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit7 de set. de 2004

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1574
TAMMY M. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LARRY STARCHER, Chief Supreme Court Justice,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph Robert Goodwin,
District Judge. (CA-04-44-2)
Submitted: August 27, 2004 Decided: September 7, 2004
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tammy M. Stone, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Tammy M. Stone appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying
Stone’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing her
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stone v.
Starcher, No. CA-04-44-2 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 1 & May 3, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.