Directv Incorporated v. Larry Key

04-1256Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit8 de jun. de 2005

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1256
DIRECTV INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LARRY KEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-03-321)
Submitted: May 27, 2005 Decided: June 8, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis T. Brown, LAW OFFICES OF CURTIS T. BROWN, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellant. Elizabeth F. Edwards, Brian E. Pumphrey, MCGUIRE
WOODS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate
judge.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Larry Key appeals the magistrate judge’s orders imposing
sanctions against Key’s counsel for discovery abuses. * We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See DIRECTV,
Inc. v. Key, No. CA-03-321 (E.D. Va. Oct. 17 & Dec. 31, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.