Michael G. Keselica v. Charles A. Moose, in his individual

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7797
MICHAEL G. KESELICA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES A. MOOSE, in his individual and
official capacity as the Montgomery County
Police Chief (since resigned); THOMAS P.
REICH, in his individual and official capacity
as a Montgomery County Police Detective (since
retired); MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT;
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Maryland,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 03-7824
MICHAEL G. KESELICA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOUGLAS GANSLER, in his individual and
official capacity as State’s Attorney for
Montgomery County, Maryland; BRYAN ROSLUND, in
his individual official capacity as Assistant
State’s Attorney for Montgomery County,
Maryland; FRANK MALONEY, in his individual and
official capacity as Assistant State’s
Attorney for Montgomery County, Maryland; THE
STATE OF MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03-
2703-1-AMD; CA-03-2704-AMD)
Submitted: March 15, 2004 Decided: April 6, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael G. Keselica, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael G. Keselica appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Keselica v.
Moose, No. CA-03-2703-1-AMD; Keselica v. Gansler, No. CA-03-2704-
AMD (D. Md. Oct. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --